Welcome to NAAPIMHA
UPCOMING EVENT
DIRECTORY
RESOURCES
ABOUT US
CONTACT US
Statistics
  Issues   • Statistics   •Consumers   •Legislation   • Cultural Competency
Workforce Training Grant   

General
Approximately 4% of the U.S. population – over 11 million people – identify themselves as Asian Americans or Pacific Islanders (AA/PIs). The AA/PI population is expected to double in the next 25 years. About 54% of AA/PIs live in western States, especially California and Hawaii. 18% live in the Northeast, 17% in the South, and 11% in the Midwest (Mental Health: Culture, Race, Ethnicity Supplement to Mental Health: Report of the Surgeon General - Fact Sheets)
Asian Americans/Pacific Islanders who seek care for a mental illness often present with more severe illnesses than do other racial or ethnic groups. This, in part, suggests that stigma and shame are critical deterrents to service utilization. It is also possible that mental illnesses may be undiagnosed or treated early in their course because they are expressed in symptoms of a physical nature. (News Release: CULTURE COUNTS IN MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES AND RESEARCH FINDS NEW SURGEON GENERAL REPORT)
Asian Indians and Japanese have median income levels of over $30,000, while Laotians have median income levels far below $10,000.
(Srinivasan, S. and Guillermo, T. Toward Improved Health: Disaggregating Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Data. American Journal of Public Health. November, 2000: 1731-1773.)
The percentage of people with incomes below the poverty line varies from 6 percent for Filipinos to as high as 63 percent for Hmong.
(Srinivasan, S. and Guillermo, T. Toward Improved Health: Disaggregating Asian American and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Data. American Journal of Public Health. November, 2000: 1731-1773.)
High school graduate rates range from 31 percent for Hmongs to 88 percent for Japanese.
(Department of Health and Human Services. Fact Sheet on Asian American and Pacific Islander Issues.)
While over half of South Asians earned at least a bachelor's degree, less than 6 percent of Tongans, Cambodians, Laotians, and Hmongs completed college. (Department of Health and Human Services. Fact Sheet on Asian American and Pacific Islander Issues.)

Suicide

Suicide rates are higher than the national average for some groups of Asian Americans. For example, the suicide rate among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in the state of California is similar to that of the total population. However, in Hawaii the rate for AAPI’s jumps to 11.2 per 100,000 people, compared to 10.8 per 100,000 rate for all people residing there. Asian-American women have the highest suicide rate among women 65 or older. (At a Glance: Suicide Among Special Populations, The Surgeon General's Call To Action To Prevent Suicide, 1999)

Compared to the suicide rate of white Americans (12.8 per 100,000 per year), the rates for Filipino (3.5), Chinese (8.3), and Japanese (9.1) Americans are substantially lower. However, Native Hawaiian adolescents have a higher risk of suicide than other adolescents in Hawaii, and older Asian American women have the highest suicide rate of all women over age 65 in the United States. There is also a growing concern about increasing suicide rates in the Pacific Basin. (Mental Health: Culture, Race, Ethnicity Supplement to Mental Health: Report of the Surgeon General - Fact Sheets)

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
AA/PIs are not overrepresented among high-need, vulnerable populations such as people who are homeless, incarcerated, or have substance abuse problems. However, they are heavily represented among refugees. Many Southeast Asian refugees are at risk for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) associated with trauma experienced before and after immigration to the U.S. One study found that 70% of Southeast Asian refugees receiving mental health care met diagnostic criteria for PTSD. In a study of Cambodian adolescents who survived Pol Pot's concentration camps, nearly half experienced PTSD and 41% suffered from depression 10 years after leaving Cambodia. (Mental Health: Culture, Race, Ethnicity Supplement to Mental Health: Report of the Surgeon General - Fact Sheets)

Substance Abuse
Prevelance of Substance Use Among Racial and Ethnic Subgroups in the United States
The Pacific Substance Abuse and Mental Health Initiative

Depression

Table 5-1 compares data from the Chinese American Psychiatric Epidemiological Study and the National Comorbidity Survey for the 12-month and lifetime prevalence of Major Depression and Dysthymia among Chinese Americans and the general population. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Mental Health: Culture, Race, Ethnicity Supplement to Mental Health: Report of the Surgeon General)


School Mental Health Services

Foster, S., Rollefson, M., Doksum, T., Noonan, D., Robinson, G., Teich, J. (2005). School mental health services in the United States, 2002–2003 (DHHS pub. No. SMA 05-4068). Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 

Retrieved from http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/media/ken/pdf/SMA05-4068/SMA05-4068.pdf (163pp; paper copy available in the library)

 (From the Executive Summary)  Recent research points to public schools as the major providers of mental health services for school-aged children. The current study, School Mental Health Services in the United States, 2002–2003, provides the first national survey of mental health services in a representative sample of the approximately 83,000 public elementary, middle, and high schools and their associated school districts in the United States.

The purpose of the study was to identify—

 • The mental health problems most frequently encountered in the U.S. public school setting and the mental health services delivered

• The administrative arrangements for the delivery and coordination of mental health services in schools

• The types and qualifications of staff providing mental health services in schools

• Issues related to funding, budgeting and resource allocation, and use of data regarding mental health services

The findings of the study provide new information about the role of schools in providing mental health services, and how these services are organized, staffed, funded, and coordinated.

The survey methodology included two mail questionnaires. The school questionnaire collected data on the types of mental health problems encountered in schools, the mental health services provided, the types and qualifications of staff providing services, the type and degree of care coordination, and the arrangements for delivering mental health services. The district questionnaire collected data on funding sources for mental health services and issues related to funding. The report also includes impressions from school administrators and mental health personnel concerning issues affecting school mental health services. Questions concerned services and supports delivered to students who have been referred and identified as having psychosocial or mental health problems.

Key Findings

• Nearly three quarters (73 percent) of the schools reported that “social, interpersonal, or family problems” were the most frequent mental health problems for both male and female students.

• For males, aggression or disruptive behavior and behavior problems associated with neurological disorders were the second and third most frequent problems.  

• For females, anxiety and adjustment issues were the second and third most frequent problems.

• All students, not just those in special education, were eligible to receive mental health services in the vast majority of schools (87 percent).

• One fifth of students on average received some type of school-supported mental health services in the school year prior to the study.

• Virtually all schools reported having at least one staff member whose responsibilities included providing mental health services to students.

• The most common types of school mental health providers were school counselors, followed by nurses, school psychologists, and social workers. School nurses spent approximately a third of their time providing mental health services.

• More than 80 percent of schools provided assessment for mental health problems, behavior management consultation, and crisis intervention, as well as referrals to specialized programs. A majority also provided individual and group counseling and case management.

• Financial constraints of families and inadequate school mental health resources were the most frequently cited barriers to providing mental health services.

• Almost half of school districts (49 percent) used contracts or other formal agreements with community-based individuals and/or organizations to provide mental health services to students. The most frequently reported community-based provider type was county mental health agencies. 

• Districts reported that the most common funding sources for mental health services or interventions were the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), State special education funds, and local funds. In 28 percent of districts, Medicaid was among the top five funding sources for mental health services.

• One third of districts reported that funding for mental health services had decreased since the beginning of the 2000–2001 school year, while over two thirds of districts reported that the need for mental health services increased.

• Sixty percent of districts reported that since the previous year, referrals to community-based providers had increased. One third reported that the availability of outside providers to deliver services to students had decreased.

While survey findings indicate that schools are responding to the mental health needs of their students, they also suggest increasing needs for mental health services and the multiple challenges faced by schools in addressing these needs. Further, more research is needed to explore issues identified by this study, including training of school staff delivering mental health services, adequacy of funding, and effectiveness of specific services delivered in the school setting.

   

 


It is solely the user's responsibility to evaluate all information accessed on the Internet from "links" on this page. NAAPIMHA does not control these external sites and does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of information at these sites.

 

 
©Copyright 2007 by NAAPIMHA. All rights reserved.